I’ve been traveling for over 30 years now. I’ve spent most of my time in the Northeast (Northern New England), and I’ve been everywhere.
Yes, the Northeast is pretty much where most of my travel has taken me. But we’ll start with a little perspective: I’ve spent most of my life in the Midwest, and the Midwest is pretty much where most of my travel has taken me. But in that area, the Northeast, I’ve been to places like New England City, New York City, and even New England City, but I’ve also been to places like New Hampshire, Vermont, and New York City.
So I guess I have two ways to look at it.
And I think that the two ways of looking at it are completely different. You can say, “Ive been to so and so place,” or you can say, “Ive been to so and so place, and Ive now been to so and so place.” I think that the first is kind of lame. I think that the second is better, because it makes it clear that Ive been to this place Ive now been to this place.
That’s an interesting point. When you say, “Ive been to so and so place,” you’re implying that you’ve been to so and so place, and that you’re now so and so place.
This is the second time Ive really had a conversation with someone who has gone to so many different places. Thats why I like the idea of the idea of getting to so many places. It makes it clear that youve been to so and so place. What I like even more is the idea that you can take that to the next level by saying, I went to so and so place, and now Ive been to so and so place.